Skip to content
SimpleDirect UK

Tetris Couldn't Succeed at The Game Awards — An Additional Classification Could Fix That

Whenever a major prize-giving event draws close, one notices a demand for introducing of new categories to honor unsung work and satisfy the hearts of followers dedicated to specific genres.

A fellow writer made the case supporting a scary games classification. That would rule. Equally deserving are board games, this being someone's personal cause. However, I must insist for pushing forward just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification backing this proposal stands as crucial and significant. The demand is this: It's essential to create a category for puzzle games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and inevitably start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. There’s a reason cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. But it is an unavoidable compromise for the industry of gaming, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

The major gaming awards offer these genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these award types actually cover many game types, allowing placement for numerous titles.

This doesn't apply to brain-teasing titles. No appropriate category exists for their placement. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: structural challenges in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

Acknowledgment Issues

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles launched regularly without proper recognition at major award shows, except when they manage to fit for categories like Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested independent game categories.

  • One classic puzzle game received no recognition completely in 2014
  • A different innovative game was excluded during that ceremony
  • A beloved organization game was overlooked recently
  • Limited numbers of brain-teasers barely qualified for independent or mobile categories

Significance of Puzzle Games

Commonly they're modest productions, but the art behind logic titles carries substantial weight. Famous handheld logic titles rank among most popular titles globally maintaining this status for over a decade.

The legendary block-stacking game rivals popular creative games for the title of most purchased experience; it’s also in the running as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, while interacting with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. You could fill multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Puzzle game makers operate at the demanding boundary of video game design, producing among the purest expressions of the video game form. Comparable to film action specialists, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay 35 years.

SM
The writer

Steven Mueller

Financial consultant and advocate for simplifying personal finance, with over a decade of industry experience.

SimpleDirect UK

Type to search articles.